Hitchen, everything on these blogs is written by yourself or your 'Child at Risk' campaign assistants. All we're doing is gathering all the information that's widely available on the internet and putting it all in one place so people can see how despicable you all are.
It's working too, isn't it? This blog is very popular with visitors and already we've passed 30,000 visits since February 28th.
You have been warned about your criminal activity because you've received a letter from West Yorkshire police telling you to stop. They certainly didn't write to you to compliment you on your self-proclaimed 'award winning' copy-and-paste blog. The fact that you won't stop your harassment, and that your supporters still encourage you, means that they are assisting an offender - the offender being you. You are all in this together.
As long as you don't stop then neither will we because while your 'Child at Risk' campaign is still ongoing then we will do everything we can to disprove your malicious lies and expose you all for what you are.
The 'attack' on your teacher friend isn't an attack. It's simply that we know she's part of your Team H who is helping you with your 'Child at Risk' campaign and we are discovering things about her too. She has been obnoxious on the internet, and in forums, for over a year now as you will note from the things we are finding.
She is a teacher, for goodness sake, and parents have a RIGHT to know what sort of people teach their kids. In fact, her position is far more important than yours because you're a nobody. You're not a qualified journalist, or anyone special, other than the owner of an online spanking shop and a copy and paste blog which you claim is accessed by schoolchildren who are, therefore, able to see your hate campaign. What sort of role model are you for these impressionable children?
Anna-May Silvestro's personal details are already on the internet, and all we're doing is putting it all in one place alongside yours. It is no different than you posting Jill's address, telephone number and business details on your business website and warning people not to have driving lessons with her because you don't like her book, even though you originally said you did like it. You seem to think that is ok, so why moan when the boot is on the other foot? You would also post Jeremy's address and telephone number if you knew it! After all, you went searching for that information in a Bradford forum, posing as Anthony, didn't you?
You, however, cannot find anything on Jeremy, Jill or Jane because there isn't anything to find is there? So you just make it up. You never provide any evidence or links like we do - you merely publish lies as though it is the truth and expect people to believe it. We are here to disprove those lies and it's very easy to do that.
We will continue to gather evidence on you and your team because we believe we are doing a service to the public to get rid of predators, with a hidden agenda like yourselves, off the internet - or at least raise public awareness to your hidden agendas.
In your latest post you talk about Jeremy intimidating you, even though he has remained silent due to legal advice, then you go on to ask how his newborn baby is in an intimidating manner. You're not concerned about the baby at all, you just use the baby to take another swipe at him. But now you are dragging his wife into your hate campaign, too.
THAT is intimidation of the worst kind because you are using a newborn baby as an ulterior motive to fight his innocent parents.
We will not stop until you, and your secret 'Dream Team', who hide behind young children (Madeleine McCann, Ben Needham, Shannon Matthews etc) are exposed and dealt with by the law.
Why did you have to retreat into a 'secret forum' to discuss Madeleine, Ben and Shannon? The 3 Arguido's openly discuss these children but people don't have to log in to be able to read it. Is it because they're not conducing a 'Child at Risk' campaign such as yours?
Why do you, a 52 year old man who writes sexually graphic stories about children, show up on Bebo as being a friend of a 16 year old girl? What possible reason is there for that?
You have threatened to distribute flyers around Bradford pubs to inform 'locals' that Jeremy is a child pervert. That is not only potentially endangering his life from vigilantes, but also the life of his newborn baby and wife.
You have accused Jill of being part of a 'paedophile ring' and posted her details on the internet which may also cause vigilantes to congregate outside her house. Why? Because you didn't like her book.
You, and your team, base your entire hate campaign on one poem that was written by a grieving father in his deepest, darkest hour - you use this poem over and over again as though it is the most vital piece of evidence to have his newborn taken away - and you drag innocent people into your hate campaign, based on this poem, simply because they chose to support this man when you made fun of his stillborn daughter in your shoutbox. As a man who does not even have children, you will not be able to understand what it means to lose one.
Children are for life, not for your perverted pleasure.
Does a baby deserve to be taken from his parents because of a poem? Does a driving instructor deserve to lose her business because of a poem - and does Jane from Fife deserve to lose her life in a suicide attempt because of a poem?
These are just some of the reasons we will not stop. We have the right to reply to your accusations and that is what we are doing.
All the links to the evidence mentioned in this post can be found on this blog.
Where is your evidence Hitchen?