Wednesday, 6 June 2012
Saturday, 25 June 2011
Tuesday, 7 June 2011
Thursday, 5 June 2008
Wednesday, 4 June 2008
Tuesday, 3 June 2008
Saturday, 31 May 2008
Mike Hitchen Profits on Madeleine McCann
You heard it here First
For several weeks Mike Hitchen has been claiming he had new ventures ahead, systems in place, ready to unleash at the right time. He claimed that with these new ventures he would make alot of money.
To quote Hitchen from his secret forum
"I will not be neglecting Madeleine McCann, in fact over the last few weeks I have put several systems in place ready to unleash at the right time."
(Yup, been very busy Hitchen, buying five dollar domain names)
"you've got to be in it to win it"
(Oh of course, $$$$$$$)
"Over a period of a few weeks, it will bring in enough until I am 55, at which age I can retire and collect my Super"
(We have always known you were in it for the money, at long last everyone else will now know)
And again
"As for the other one, that's under wraps for now, wouldn't want the little non-achievers shuffling around in the slums of their little slum cities getting jealous"
Opppppppppsssssss Maggot, did we just reveal your big secret? Us non-achievers? Hehehehehehehe
Us so called non achievers have discovered Hitchens plot to make money off the name of Madeleine McCann and others.
Mike Hitchen has purchased domain names in order to resell to the highest bidder.
conquistadorial.com $300
He created most of these in May of this year and immediately put them up for sale here
We have always known that Mike Hitchen did his best to make money from the innocent name of Madeleine McCann while at the same time fuelling hatred to others for doing the same thing. Did you want it all for yourself Hitchen?
The domain, themadeleinemccannstory.com AND .co.uk were created on 17th May 2008 as you can see here in this Link. Probably purchased for $5 or less. He is selling themadeleinemccannstory for $350,000 for the .com domain and $90,000 for the .co.uk domain.
The term used for con men as such, is "Cybersquatting" according to the United States federal law known as the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, is registering, trafficking in, or using a domain name with bad faith intent to profit from the goodwill of a trademark belonging to someone else. The cybersquatter then offers to sell the domain to the person or company who owns a trademark contained within the name at an inflated price. Link
What Mike Hitchen is doing is illegal. Madeleine McCann is a trademark as far as I am aware and I would advise everyone reading this to please inform the families of the above domain names so that they can take the appropriate action against this known pervert cybersquatter, Mike Hitchen.
Perverts and con men who make money from the sad misfortune of others need to be stopped today. It has now been proven that, Hitchen, the self acclaimed voice for Madeleine McCann, is trying to make a Massive Profit for selling her Name. A massive profit that he hopes to retire on.
Well Hitchen, I hope you can sleep at night, with your pockets full of those dollar signs you love so much, the dollars you will make from the sale of an innocent, still missing, little girl, Madeleine McCann. The little girl you have claimed to be a voice for. Now we have proven without a doubt what you really think of Madeleine McCann.
For several weeks Mike Hitchen has been claiming he had new ventures ahead, systems in place, ready to unleash at the right time. He claimed that with these new ventures he would make alot of money.
To quote Hitchen from his secret forum
"I will not be neglecting Madeleine McCann, in fact over the last few weeks I have put several systems in place ready to unleash at the right time."
(Yup, been very busy Hitchen, buying five dollar domain names)
"you've got to be in it to win it"
(Oh of course, $$$$$$$)
"Over a period of a few weeks, it will bring in enough until I am 55, at which age I can retire and collect my Super"
(We have always known you were in it for the money, at long last everyone else will now know)
And again
"As for the other one, that's under wraps for now, wouldn't want the little non-achievers shuffling around in the slums of their little slum cities getting jealous"
Opppppppppsssssss Maggot, did we just reveal your big secret? Us non-achievers? Hehehehehehehe
Us so called non achievers have discovered Hitchens plot to make money off the name of Madeleine McCann and others.
Mike Hitchen has purchased domain names in order to resell to the highest bidder.
conquistadorial.com $300
gladette.com $300
herdad.com $300
hilaryclinton2012.com $25,000
ionglobaltrends.com$600
janetanner.com$49,000
janetanner.info
janetanner.net
janetanner.org
karenmatthews.com$20,000
themadeleinemccannstory.com$350,000
themadeleinemccannstory.org
therobertmuratstory.com $50,000
thetruestoryofmadeleinemccann.com
themadeleinemccannstory.co.uk $90,000
themadeleinemccannstory.co.uk $90,000
He created most of these in May of this year and immediately put them up for sale here
Here is where to find the individual Ads that Hitchen has made, Just click on the "Link" to go directly to the ad.
Janetanner.com $49,000 Link
Themadeleinemccannaffair.com $15,000 Link
themadeleinemccannstory.co.uk $90,000 Link
themadeleinemccannstory.com $350,000 Link
therobertmuratstory.com $50,000 Link
karenmatthews.com $20,000 Link
hilaryclinton2012.com $25,000 Link
ionglobaltrends.com $6,000 Link
We have always known that Mike Hitchen did his best to make money from the innocent name of Madeleine McCann while at the same time fuelling hatred to others for doing the same thing. Did you want it all for yourself Hitchen?
It is clear that Mike Hitchen purchased these Domains recently and immediately put them up for sale for a massive profit.
The domain, themadeleinemccannstory.com AND .co.uk were created on 17th May 2008 as you can see here in this Link. Probably purchased for $5 or less. He is selling themadeleinemccannstory for $350,000 for the .com domain and $90,000 for the .co.uk domain.
The term used for con men as such, is "Cybersquatting" according to the United States federal law known as the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, is registering, trafficking in, or using a domain name with bad faith intent to profit from the goodwill of a trademark belonging to someone else. The cybersquatter then offers to sell the domain to the person or company who owns a trademark contained within the name at an inflated price. Link
What Mike Hitchen is doing is illegal. Madeleine McCann is a trademark as far as I am aware and I would advise everyone reading this to please inform the families of the above domain names so that they can take the appropriate action against this known pervert cybersquatter, Mike Hitchen.
Perverts and con men who make money from the sad misfortune of others need to be stopped today. It has now been proven that, Hitchen, the self acclaimed voice for Madeleine McCann, is trying to make a Massive Profit for selling her Name. A massive profit that he hopes to retire on.
Well Hitchen, I hope you can sleep at night, with your pockets full of those dollar signs you love so much, the dollars you will make from the sale of an innocent, still missing, little girl, Madeleine McCann. The little girl you have claimed to be a voice for. Now we have proven without a doubt what you really think of Madeleine McCann.
A Fan/Maria from Ireland
Friday, 30 May 2008
Mike Hitchen, the "Voice for Madeleine McCann" aims to sell her name for $350,000 as "high commercial potential"
Mike Hitchen buys up domain names to make money out of Madeleine McCann tragedy
Link
conquistadorial.com $300
gladette.com $300
herdad.com $300
hilaryclinton2012.com $25,000
ionglobaltrends.com $600
janetanner.com $49,000
janetanner.info
janetanner.net
janetanner.org
karenmatthews.com $20,000
mhitchenconsult.com
michaelhitchen.com
mikehitchen.com
themadeleinemccannstory.com $35,000
themadeleinemccannstory.org
therobertmuratstory.com $50,000
thetruestoryofmadeleinemccann.com
themadeleinemccannstory.co.uk $90,000
Hitchen is selling Madeleine McCann's domain name for $35,000
Thursday, 29 May 2008
Tuesday, 27 May 2008
Mike Hitchen and his "3 druggies" discuss their medication whilst taking a break from slagging off TFA who they call a junkie
Monday, 26 May 2008
Thursday, 22 May 2008
Is Mike Hitchen luring schoolchildren to his blog by publishing his hate campaign on educational articles?
Only Hitchen could take a so-called Business Blog that he alleges is accessed by schoolchildren - and turn human tragedies like the China earthquake; Human Trafficking of teenage girls and the Madeleine McCann mystery, into an excuse to publish his hate campaign.
What possible reason is there for him to advertise The JY Files and JKH Files at the bottom of every news article? Indeed, what possible reason is there for him to file his hate campaign blogs with Madeleine McCann's name other than to exploit this, possibly, dead child to lure people to his blog.
Let's not forget that Hitchen uses his blog, not only to encourage schoolchildren to view, but also to display what he considers is exploitation of a stillborn baby in a hospital and his blackmail letter to Bradford Police. Does Hitchen really think he is helping with childrens' education by publishing this libellous material on his blog?
Or, worse, is this how Hitchen drums up child customers from the schools for his online discipline business when they click on these links?
Come off it, Hitchen, your blog is nothing more a playground that you use for sickening bullying of innocent people, including babies, and a grotesque way of grooming children - as on Bebo.
Your 'hidden agenda' is exposed and many people are not liking what they see and feel it is a public duty to have you investigated.
Tuesday, 20 May 2008
How nice that members of maggot's forum come here to view the evidence yet still support him
What sort of people must they be?
Or, worse, what hold has Hitchen got over them that they can come here and see the truth then go back there? Is it because they know he's got their details and will use it against them as they do with others'?
http://xsorbit28.com/users5/teamh/
http://xsorbit28.com/users5/teamh/
Monday, 19 May 2008
Comment taken from 'Mike Hitchen is a Pervert' blog
The comment left on the new blog sums it up effectively.
It is noted that the MHIAP blog publishes libel with no evidence - which is exactly what Mike Hitchen does on his "Identifying a Child at Risk" and various other blogs in his hate campaign. I would also suggest that Hitchen is writing these blogs in order to encourage Anna-May Silvestro and Mariana Faithful to make complaints to the police in order to strengthen his own case, and weaken ours.
Mike Hitchen has also not added the new blog to his press release on his business blog.
It is also noted that posts and images are being stolen from this blog in an effort to discredit this blog and I have now added a disclaimer that states we have nothing to do with that blog. After all the hard work and research that has gone into this blog, why would we want our work discredited?
As the poster says, there is only one person who would benefit from discrediting this blog and that is Hitchen himself.
Clearly Hitchen has mental problems - how else can you explain his need to write sexual stories about children and stories about how he wears dresses and make up in front of his mother (who he has publicly stated he is taking revenge on); and who makes jokes about a stillborn baby and instigates a Child at Risk campaign to have a newborn baby taken from his parents based on a poem that was written whilst the father was in the depths of despair?
Is this really the behaviour of a normal person?
This blog only publishes fact and truth with links to all evidence.
Saturday, 17 May 2008
Mike Hitchen, the two-faced pervert blames JKH and TFA for the libellous post he made about Anna-May Silvestro on his own blog
Mike Hitchen, the two-faced pervert blames JKH and TFA for the libellous post he made about Anna-May Silvestro.
Hitchen, you are the one who quotes people's real names and schools! And you've just done it again in your latest post.You have posted Jane Freer's name and address and you have also posted JKH's real name and address aswell as the name of her driving school. The only reason you haven't posted TFA's address is because you can't find it!
All you're doing, Hitchen, is libelling people and blaming others for your crimes.
How can anything you say be believed when this blog is FULL of evidence that disproves everything you say?
It is obvious that you made that post and then deleted it just to further your own vindictive attack on JKH and TFA.
How much lower can you sink? Is it not enough that you are already attacking a newborn baby?
You are a proven LIAR!
Friday, 16 May 2008
Hate Campaign stalker Mike Hitchen lied about making a complaint to the Driving Standards Agency about Jill Havern
Yet another of Mike Hitchen's lies has been exposed. He did not make a complaint to the Driving Standards Agency about Jill Havern. She wrote to the DSA to ask if a complaint had been made. She received an acknowledgement but no response so sent the email again - 4 times in total. She finally got a response today and it is clear that NO complaint has been made against her by Mike Hitchen, or anybody else for that matter.
It makes you wonder why he posts these malicious, libellous, lies all over the internet. It certainly doesn't do anything for his credibility and only makes the police complaints stronger.
Tuesday, 13 May 2008
Mike Hitchen's libellous blogs accessed by police for their investigation of him
Mike Hitchen says that his (ahem, cough cough) "award winning blog" (which he votes for himself) boasts visitors from US Government Departments, US Universities, schools, NATO and overseas government departments and leading organisations...
then goes on to list 10 articles in his Hate Campaign, some of which are filed under the section titled Madeleine McCann.
Are your 'high profile' visitors impressed with your hate campaign Hitchen?
You forgot to mention that at least 3 police forces are also visiting your blogs too :)
Monday, 12 May 2008
Another question
Mike Hitchen's hypocritical quote of the century: "But then again, I am not the one who continually writes about sex with children."
Oh, you're not? Hitchen, isn't it you who continually writes about tying a child to a ladder before whipping her and exploring her "Garden of Eden" and isn't it you who wrote about putting your filthy hands down Jack's pants to squeeze his testicles?
Second hypocritical quote of the century: "Why is it that without fail, you and your supporters make your allegations and outlandish allegations about me, hiding behind "anonymous"?
Hitchen, although we know the 'Identifying A Child at Risk' blog is yours because you copy and paste the same filth on your own blog, you do not actually use your own name on the libellous blogs. You are the one hiding behind "anonymous" making outlandish allegations!
Makes you think doesn't it?
Proven child pervert Mike Hitchen calls for boycott of driving school by linking it to child abuse
Mike Hitchen, the Lane Cove sicko and internet stalker, who fantasises about spanking children whilst watching "Play School" links driving school to child abuse in an effort to discredit and ruin the owner who rejected his sexual advances. He has already linked her book about the NHS to child abuse in an effort to discredit her as an author, simply because he did not like the book even though he never read it.
Thursday, 8 May 2008
Mike Hitchen's blogs NOT worth reading
22 Blogs allegedly "worth reading"
12 of them are his own
10 of which are his 'hate campaign' blogs
2 of the remainders are also part of his hate campaign
And this is a blog that Hitchen says is accessed by schoolchildren?
He and his schoolteacher supporters are showing kids how to bully.
Wednesday, 7 May 2008
Attached Parenting In The Face Of Bullying
Post by Jeremy Young
Oh it's great being a hippy dad. Well ok, I'm not a hippy as such - more an attached parent - but let's not get bogged down in terminology. Especially when it is such a sunny day and I have been out for a walk with piglet in the baby sling (not that one btw).
It's such a nice feeling walking about and with piglet in the sunshine - and the sling is ideal because you can talk to the baby about the stuff going on around you. I suspect that I might have looked a little bit nutty - but then no more so than the people who walk round with those mobile phones which attach to their ears - in fact probably less so since I was saying things like 'that was an ambulance and the siren was going because they are hurrying to the hospital' instead of 'fish fingers, buy, buy, sell, sell'.Oh and of course wherever we went there were people billing and cooing and sneaking a quick look and saying what a lovely baby - which is of course the truth.Yes it's nice being a hippy dad - or attached parent.
Anywho...I notice Mike Hitchen continues his campaign of harrassment against me and my family.I haven't really been keeping up with all the twists and turns of his ferbrile mind, prefering to just let the police get on with their job of investigating him and his chums on the secret forum.When I say I haven't been keeping up with matters, what I mean is that occasionally I pop along to the mikehitchenreferncelibrary to see if there is anything that needs to be refered to the police. Which generally there isn't, because all he is doing is repeating the same old stuff over and over again in order to boost the google ranking of his Child Protection Campaign - and the police are already aware of this stuff and investigating it - which makes it all sound very grand, until you actually go and read it and realise that in fact he is completely clueless of the circumstances of my family and driven entirely by malice. I did notice a curious thing the other day though. Apparently community groups are allowed to advertise on Mr Hitchen's blog free of charge - which is odd because that is exactly the same offer as JPC make and back in January when there was a forum attached to this blog, there was a JPC employee who took the opportunity to attack those who were using the forum to track the online activities of Mr Hitchen - the employee in question was a called Susie Neal, who was happy enough to use the company email asytem to do this - which did make me wonder if there was a connection between JPC and Mike Hitchen..... but maybe not...... you know how paranoid people get when they are being stalked and harrassed.
For those who haven't been following this harrassment campaign by Mike Hitchen, I went to the police in March after Mr Hitchen and his supporters started emailing social services making false allegations against me and my partner of child abuse, of a sexual nature - allegations that Mr Hitchen's continues to publish, despite being warned by the police to stop.One of the latest posts from Mr Hitchen can be found here. And as per usual contains factual inaccuracies. For instance, I have made no statements to the police - I have reported the incidents of harrassment, but as yet have not been asked to make a statement. The police do agree that Mr Hitchen's activities are criminal, the would not have sent a warning letter if they did not, the problem they have is that because he is in Lane Cove, Sydney Austrailia, prosecution of the offences - which are also criminal offences in Austrailia - relies on the New South Wales police, who have been informed. The police have not spoken to me with regard to anything thing other than the campaign of harrassment being waged by Mr Hitchen.What he is refering to is the offer he made to the police with regard to him stopping his illegal activities.The offer was that in return for me making a full public apology for the anguish and suffering caused to him and his mother, and the guarantee that I would never mention his name in any written form again, he would remove his Child Protection website - which I believe this jpeg is taken from. Which of course I declined to do. For the very obvious reason that I am not about to apologise to someone, for something I have not done, when they have accused me of murdering my daughter and raping her dead body: presumably in the hospital - both of which are sick beyond belief and totally without foundation - especially as the offending articles are double posted on Mr Hitchen's other blog site, which makes his offer totally meaningless. And yet another of his fabrications. This 'offer' was backed up with the claim that unless I complied with his demands a documentary about me would be posted on the internet - which rather amusingly was commented on by the police officer who rang me, as Mr Hitchen making more threats.Quite how this means that I am not mindful of the welfare of my family is not clear to me - especially given that my daughters memory has been kidnapped, raped and abused by this person who has a known sexual interest in children as demonstrated here, here, and here: and while we are on the theme of Catholic spanking, your local priest may be surprised to learn that the catholic church in Austrailia appears to give references for spanking partners. Regular readers of this blog will know that I have not made a sustained attack on Mr Hitchen's or indeed his followers, which appear to include someone whose online name is Primavera.
Apparently this person is a supply teacher at Etone Community college - which if true does make one wonder if the college knows that she spends her spare time engaging in hate campaigns? Indeed you might argue that I made the mistake of not actually attacking Mr Hitchen in person and choosing instead to use names Spanky The Bush Kangeroo, Norman 'Spanky' Bates, and the Maggot, before ignoring him, and then going to the police when his obssesion continued and he attempted, by use of lies, innuendo and smears, to have piglet removed from the loving care of myself and my partner.Of course being obsessed Mr Hitchen chooses to ignore the warning he has already recieved and then interprest what he claims to have been the message he recieved from the police, as their backing in terms of his campaign of harrassment. When in fact the message could be read in entirely the opposite way and in fact I suspect that was the way it was meant to be read.Say what you like about the police but they do not like nonces.With regard to this business about masturbation and my use of the phrase 'pimping'.
I refer you back to the post I made in November when Mr Hitchen began his campaign of harrassment, namely Journey into Depravity and you will note what I actually said:"And equally unlikely, is that I am about to post pictures of our dead child just to prove something that does not need proving. Not least because I suspect Mr Hitchen will mastubate over the picture, given his total lack of restraint or decency. "And though I have searched for the comment about pimping - without success, I believe it is in the comments somewhere - I am pretty certain that my actual phrase was that 'I am not about to start pimping out my daughter' to a man with a known and well documented quasi-sexual - in the sense that inflicting pain for sexual gratification cannot really be described as sexual in the true sense of the word - interest in children. What parent would?I should also like to make it clear that I have no connection, and never have had with mikehitchenreferancelibrary, though it has been a useful source of information, and it also alerted me to the fact that social services had been informed of Mr Hitchen's idiotic claims, as well as the attempts by Mr Hitchen to stir up vigilantte violence against myself and my family by attempting to publicise his perverted views by posting links to his various blog sites to news feeds.
I do find myself wondering what he hopes to gain by this. Supposedly the aim is to get newspapers to take up the story. And presumably shame the police and social services into action. I would suggest that any story that does result would be far more damaging to Mr Hitchen.It should also be pointed out that Mr Hitchen has been using the net to find addresses of various people who are members of various groups that I am affiliated to, and has been emailing them in a vain attempt to make them aware of 'the turth' about me and the missus. The people who recieved these emails of course ignored them for the offensive spam that they are.As for the missus being Mother of the Year, well I think she does a damned fine job, and so does piglet - which would explain why we are the proud parents of a happy and contented baby. Who draws admiring looks when out with his daddy in the sunshine. Yes we wish we had a daughter too, and in our hearts we still do, but one cannot have everything in life and as things go we are pretty much contented with our lot.
Yeah being homeless because of a hate campaign ain't much fun, but then being the subject of a perverse 'Child Protection' campaign that seeks to destroy the life of a child, ain't much fun either. But we are certainly a damned sight more contented that those who seek to destroy us by use of lies.
peace:)
ps I leave you to interpret who has been lying to the police.
pps Before the bullies behind the hate campaign start running around claiming that this post is a sign of harrassment and isn't it awful etc, I am simply setting the record straight with regard to a few matters.
Oh it's great being a hippy dad. Well ok, I'm not a hippy as such - more an attached parent - but let's not get bogged down in terminology. Especially when it is such a sunny day and I have been out for a walk with piglet in the baby sling (not that one btw).
It's such a nice feeling walking about and with piglet in the sunshine - and the sling is ideal because you can talk to the baby about the stuff going on around you. I suspect that I might have looked a little bit nutty - but then no more so than the people who walk round with those mobile phones which attach to their ears - in fact probably less so since I was saying things like 'that was an ambulance and the siren was going because they are hurrying to the hospital' instead of 'fish fingers, buy, buy, sell, sell'.Oh and of course wherever we went there were people billing and cooing and sneaking a quick look and saying what a lovely baby - which is of course the truth.Yes it's nice being a hippy dad - or attached parent.
Anywho...I notice Mike Hitchen continues his campaign of harrassment against me and my family.I haven't really been keeping up with all the twists and turns of his ferbrile mind, prefering to just let the police get on with their job of investigating him and his chums on the secret forum.When I say I haven't been keeping up with matters, what I mean is that occasionally I pop along to the mikehitchenreferncelibrary to see if there is anything that needs to be refered to the police. Which generally there isn't, because all he is doing is repeating the same old stuff over and over again in order to boost the google ranking of his Child Protection Campaign - and the police are already aware of this stuff and investigating it - which makes it all sound very grand, until you actually go and read it and realise that in fact he is completely clueless of the circumstances of my family and driven entirely by malice. I did notice a curious thing the other day though. Apparently community groups are allowed to advertise on Mr Hitchen's blog free of charge - which is odd because that is exactly the same offer as JPC make and back in January when there was a forum attached to this blog, there was a JPC employee who took the opportunity to attack those who were using the forum to track the online activities of Mr Hitchen - the employee in question was a called Susie Neal, who was happy enough to use the company email asytem to do this - which did make me wonder if there was a connection between JPC and Mike Hitchen..... but maybe not...... you know how paranoid people get when they are being stalked and harrassed.
For those who haven't been following this harrassment campaign by Mike Hitchen, I went to the police in March after Mr Hitchen and his supporters started emailing social services making false allegations against me and my partner of child abuse, of a sexual nature - allegations that Mr Hitchen's continues to publish, despite being warned by the police to stop.One of the latest posts from Mr Hitchen can be found here. And as per usual contains factual inaccuracies. For instance, I have made no statements to the police - I have reported the incidents of harrassment, but as yet have not been asked to make a statement. The police do agree that Mr Hitchen's activities are criminal, the would not have sent a warning letter if they did not, the problem they have is that because he is in Lane Cove, Sydney Austrailia, prosecution of the offences - which are also criminal offences in Austrailia - relies on the New South Wales police, who have been informed. The police have not spoken to me with regard to anything thing other than the campaign of harrassment being waged by Mr Hitchen.What he is refering to is the offer he made to the police with regard to him stopping his illegal activities.The offer was that in return for me making a full public apology for the anguish and suffering caused to him and his mother, and the guarantee that I would never mention his name in any written form again, he would remove his Child Protection website - which I believe this jpeg is taken from. Which of course I declined to do. For the very obvious reason that I am not about to apologise to someone, for something I have not done, when they have accused me of murdering my daughter and raping her dead body: presumably in the hospital - both of which are sick beyond belief and totally without foundation - especially as the offending articles are double posted on Mr Hitchen's other blog site, which makes his offer totally meaningless. And yet another of his fabrications. This 'offer' was backed up with the claim that unless I complied with his demands a documentary about me would be posted on the internet - which rather amusingly was commented on by the police officer who rang me, as Mr Hitchen making more threats.Quite how this means that I am not mindful of the welfare of my family is not clear to me - especially given that my daughters memory has been kidnapped, raped and abused by this person who has a known sexual interest in children as demonstrated here, here, and here: and while we are on the theme of Catholic spanking, your local priest may be surprised to learn that the catholic church in Austrailia appears to give references for spanking partners. Regular readers of this blog will know that I have not made a sustained attack on Mr Hitchen's or indeed his followers, which appear to include someone whose online name is Primavera.
Apparently this person is a supply teacher at Etone Community college - which if true does make one wonder if the college knows that she spends her spare time engaging in hate campaigns? Indeed you might argue that I made the mistake of not actually attacking Mr Hitchen in person and choosing instead to use names Spanky The Bush Kangeroo, Norman 'Spanky' Bates, and the Maggot, before ignoring him, and then going to the police when his obssesion continued and he attempted, by use of lies, innuendo and smears, to have piglet removed from the loving care of myself and my partner.Of course being obsessed Mr Hitchen chooses to ignore the warning he has already recieved and then interprest what he claims to have been the message he recieved from the police, as their backing in terms of his campaign of harrassment. When in fact the message could be read in entirely the opposite way and in fact I suspect that was the way it was meant to be read.Say what you like about the police but they do not like nonces.With regard to this business about masturbation and my use of the phrase 'pimping'.
I refer you back to the post I made in November when Mr Hitchen began his campaign of harrassment, namely Journey into Depravity and you will note what I actually said:"And equally unlikely, is that I am about to post pictures of our dead child just to prove something that does not need proving. Not least because I suspect Mr Hitchen will mastubate over the picture, given his total lack of restraint or decency. "And though I have searched for the comment about pimping - without success, I believe it is in the comments somewhere - I am pretty certain that my actual phrase was that 'I am not about to start pimping out my daughter' to a man with a known and well documented quasi-sexual - in the sense that inflicting pain for sexual gratification cannot really be described as sexual in the true sense of the word - interest in children. What parent would?I should also like to make it clear that I have no connection, and never have had with mikehitchenreferancelibrary, though it has been a useful source of information, and it also alerted me to the fact that social services had been informed of Mr Hitchen's idiotic claims, as well as the attempts by Mr Hitchen to stir up vigilantte violence against myself and my family by attempting to publicise his perverted views by posting links to his various blog sites to news feeds.
I do find myself wondering what he hopes to gain by this. Supposedly the aim is to get newspapers to take up the story. And presumably shame the police and social services into action. I would suggest that any story that does result would be far more damaging to Mr Hitchen.It should also be pointed out that Mr Hitchen has been using the net to find addresses of various people who are members of various groups that I am affiliated to, and has been emailing them in a vain attempt to make them aware of 'the turth' about me and the missus. The people who recieved these emails of course ignored them for the offensive spam that they are.As for the missus being Mother of the Year, well I think she does a damned fine job, and so does piglet - which would explain why we are the proud parents of a happy and contented baby. Who draws admiring looks when out with his daddy in the sunshine. Yes we wish we had a daughter too, and in our hearts we still do, but one cannot have everything in life and as things go we are pretty much contented with our lot.
Yeah being homeless because of a hate campaign ain't much fun, but then being the subject of a perverse 'Child Protection' campaign that seeks to destroy the life of a child, ain't much fun either. But we are certainly a damned sight more contented that those who seek to destroy us by use of lies.
peace:)
ps I leave you to interpret who has been lying to the police.
pps Before the bullies behind the hate campaign start running around claiming that this post is a sign of harrassment and isn't it awful etc, I am simply setting the record straight with regard to a few matters.
http://trannyfattyacid.blogspot.com/2008/05/attached-parenting-in-face-of-bullying.html
Tuesday, 6 May 2008
Saturday, 3 May 2008
Friday, 2 May 2008
Thursday, 1 May 2008
Cowardly baby-basher Mike Hitchen issues new threat via an anonymous supporter
What are you fighting exactly?
A hate campaign that has a newborn baby at the centre of it. A hate campaign started by Mike Hitchen simply because he didn't like the father. A hate campaign that grew to vile proportions, dragging other innocent people into it, because we chose to support the father when Hitchen attacked the father's stillborn baby.
You and Hitchen have so far attacked two babies now in an attempt to destroy the father's life. You have also dragged his wife into it, aswell as other innocent people - one of them who has already tried to end her life because of Hitchen.
You and Mike Hitchen use babies as weapons.
If you want to fight a hate campaign of that obscene nature then we are here to stay to ensure Hitchen and the likes of you are dealt with by the police. Whilst we are all under threat from people like you and Mike Hitchen, how can we get our lives back?
Thank you for your visit - the evidence collected is extremely important to help strengthen our cause.
Wednesday, 30 April 2008
Thursday, 24 April 2008
Wednesday, 23 April 2008
Oh, the irony!
Click image to enlarge"There is not one word of truth in what you have said. I have always reacted negatively to those who, with their snotty noses and erotic fantasies, prowl into others' lives."
Oh the irony! Mike Hitchen uses a quote from Vladimir Putin to express himself.
How ironic that this is the man who prowled into the lives of the McCann's for almost a year and threatens to write a book about them.
And we know what sort of book he's capable of writing don't we?
"Gerry the Spanking Genie and Bratty Little Kate get Spanked"
LOL
What is it Mike Hitchen calls Jeremy Young? A slum dwelling housing association tenant?
It would seem that Mike Hitchen is a council flat dwelling tenant himself.
It would seem that Mike Hitchen is a council flat dwelling tenant himself.
Mike Hitchen, taking a picture of himself in a traffic light, outside his council flat
Slightly different version
A slightly different version of the post below now appears on http://protectthechildrennow.blogspot.com/Show us the "proveable lies" Hitchen - we're proving what a liar you are, so you do the same.
What are you afraid of?
Mike Hitchen's latest spew
Hitchen, everything on these blogs is written by yourself or your 'Child at Risk' campaign assistants. All we're doing is gathering all the information that's widely available on the internet and putting it all in one place so people can see how despicable you all are.
It's working too, isn't it? This blog is very popular with visitors and already we've passed 30,000 visits since February 28th.
You have been warned about your criminal activity because you've received a letter from West Yorkshire police telling you to stop. They certainly didn't write to you to compliment you on your self-proclaimed 'award winning' copy-and-paste blog. The fact that you won't stop your harassment, and that your supporters still encourage you, means that they are assisting an offender - the offender being you. You are all in this together.
As long as you don't stop then neither will we because while your 'Child at Risk' campaign is still ongoing then we will do everything we can to disprove your malicious lies and expose you all for what you are.
The 'attack' on your teacher friend isn't an attack. It's simply that we know she's part of your Team H who is helping you with your 'Child at Risk' campaign and we are discovering things about her too. She has been obnoxious on the internet, and in forums, for over a year now as you will note from the things we are finding.
She is a teacher, for goodness sake, and parents have a RIGHT to know what sort of people teach their kids. In fact, her position is far more important than yours because you're a nobody. You're not a qualified journalist, or anyone special, other than the owner of an online spanking shop and a copy and paste blog which you claim is accessed by schoolchildren who are, therefore, able to see your hate campaign. What sort of role model are you for these impressionable children?
Anna-May Silvestro's personal details are already on the internet, and all we're doing is putting it all in one place alongside yours. It is no different than you posting Jill's address, telephone number and business details on your business website and warning people not to have driving lessons with her because you don't like her book, even though you originally said you did like it. You seem to think that is ok, so why moan when the boot is on the other foot? You would also post Jeremy's address and telephone number if you knew it! After all, you went searching for that information in a Bradford forum, posing as Anthony, didn't you?
You, however, cannot find anything on Jeremy, Jill or Jane because there isn't anything to find is there? So you just make it up. You never provide any evidence or links like we do - you merely publish lies as though it is the truth and expect people to believe it. We are here to disprove those lies and it's very easy to do that.
We will continue to gather evidence on you and your team because we believe we are doing a service to the public to get rid of predators, with a hidden agenda like yourselves, off the internet - or at least raise public awareness to your hidden agendas.
In your latest post you talk about Jeremy intimidating you, even though he has remained silent due to legal advice, then you go on to ask how his newborn baby is in an intimidating manner. You're not concerned about the baby at all, you just use the baby to take another swipe at him. But now you are dragging his wife into your hate campaign, too.
THAT is intimidation of the worst kind because you are using a newborn baby as an ulterior motive to fight his innocent parents.
We will not stop until you, and your secret 'Dream Team', who hide behind young children (Madeleine McCann, Ben Needham, Shannon Matthews etc) are exposed and dealt with by the law.
Why did you have to retreat into a 'secret forum' to discuss Madeleine, Ben and Shannon? The 3 Arguido's openly discuss these children but people don't have to log in to be able to read it. Is it because they're not conducing a 'Child at Risk' campaign such as yours?
Why do you, a 52 year old man who writes sexually graphic stories about children, show up on Bebo as being a friend of a 16 year old girl? What possible reason is there for that?
You have threatened to distribute flyers around Bradford pubs to inform 'locals' that Jeremy is a child pervert. That is not only potentially endangering his life from vigilantes, but also the life of his newborn baby and wife.
You have accused Jill of being part of a 'paedophile ring' and posted her details on the internet which may also cause vigilantes to congregate outside her house. Why? Because you didn't like her book.
You, and your team, base your entire hate campaign on one poem that was written by a grieving father in his deepest, darkest hour - you use this poem over and over again as though it is the most vital piece of evidence to have his newborn taken away - and you drag innocent people into your hate campaign, based on this poem, simply because they chose to support this man when you made fun of his stillborn daughter in your shoutbox. As a man who does not even have children, you will not be able to understand what it means to lose one.
Children are for life, not for your perverted pleasure.
Does a baby deserve to be taken from his parents because of a poem? Does a driving instructor deserve to lose her business because of a poem - and does Jane from Fife deserve to lose her life in a suicide attempt because of a poem?
These are just some of the reasons we will not stop. We have the right to reply to your accusations and that is what we are doing.
All the links to the evidence mentioned in this post can be found on this blog.
Where is your evidence Hitchen?
Tuesday, 22 April 2008
Anna-May Silvestro is Primavera, the Warwickshire supply schoolteacher, who is assisting an offender by the name of Mike Hitchen
Anna-May Silvestro's online aliases are Primavera or AnnaEsse. She is the Warwickshire supply schoolteacher (Etone school) and is an acupuncture practioner. She is assisting an offender by the name of Mike Hitchen in his secret 'Dream Team' forum where they discuss Hitchen's 'Child at Risk' campaign.
She is aware of this blog and she is aware of the police letter that was sent to Hitchen stating that there is NO evidence of any criminal activity, except his own, yet still she supports his campaign.
Is she really the sort of person we need to be teaching our young kids? A person who knowingly links herself to Mike Hitchen who is proven, by all the evidence contained in these blogs, to be a pervert who writes graphic stories about abusing children?
Hitchen updates Child at Risk blog
Mike Hitchen updates his 'Child at Risk' campaign blog to include reference to the NSPCC baby, as though he knew about it all along. However, he fails to remove the reference to Jeremy's wife who, along with their newborn baby 'Piglet' (month old 'Piglet' is the subject of Hitchen's Hate Campaign) is totally innocent of all accusations as proven by the letter from the police.
(link to letter below in which the police say there is NO evidence of any criminal activity and NO further investigation by the police is required. However, Hitchen continues to refer to Jeremy as a child pervert and questions his wife's ability to be a mother, despite being warned by the police to desist from making these unfounded and defamatory accusations)
originalMonday, 21 April 2008
Mike Hitchen displays his latest libellous filth on his 'business' blog that is accessed by schoolchildren
Sunday, 20 April 2008
Mike Hitchen has a rant
One of Mike Hitchen's rants at someone else - but it sounds all so familiar
For heavens sake lighten up; you are becoming a crashing bore with your uninformed, judgmental brand of coffee bar socialism regarding. issues you know very little about.
If you just stop whining for a while and read on, then you may actually learn from someone who I can assure you, knows far more about these things than your incredible naivety shows you ever will.
I run two businesses in which emotional issues are very much part and parcel of the work. If those involved in small business or "start ups" are experiencing personal, financial, family problems etc, that will affect their business. A great part of my work involves listening and trying to help solve those problems.
I get at least one client a week telling me they are contemplating suicide, and as yet, no one ever has. It is not something you can detach yourself from easily, especially when you have the experience and judgement to gauge the potential of such an act, and care about the people concerned.
In the last few weeks I have had seven "clients" lose someone close to them. I use inverted commas, because these people are more than just clients, they have become people I care about. At the same time, several close friends have also been through a lot.
I too have major problems both with my own health and that of a very close family member.
The point of the above is that Rufus is not in the above category. He is a professional attention seeker and one of the tools he uses to draw attention to himself is to hurt people. He has hurt Courtney, Beth, Dawn and many others. He goes out of his way to do so without any provocation.
It's his choice. I am not about to concern myself with some insignificant little arsehole who goes out of his way to hurt people I care about
People think I am hard because I often refuse those who come up to me in the street and ask for money or cigarettes. Those who judge me are much like yourself, they think they know the facts, would like to believe they know the facts - but don't.
For a very long time I worked in a homeless men's centre, something which is well documented. I know the difference between those who are genuine and those who are professional beggars. Those whoare genuine get any assistance I am able to give. The others...well I will let you figure out what they get. It's the same with Rufus.
Most of the people he has hurt know Rufus and are also emotionally strong enough to put his hate in perspective. But one day he will attack someone who is not so strong. They may be going through a difficult time, or they may just be sensitive. An attack by Rufus may just be the final straw.
Have you considered that fact at all? or do the narrow parameters of your home-on-the-range social philosophy extend only to defending someone who may top himself because he has received a negative reaction to a course of action he chose to embark on?
I have very little sympathy for anyone who hurts myself, family, friends or business. I count Court, Beth and Dawn as good friends - very good in fact. I do not care one iota about the perpetrator of hurt, but I do care about those who are the victims. When that happens my motto is "whatever it takes".
People who have hurt or crossed me have suffered nervous breakdowns and a marriage breakup as a consequence of my actions. I view those as positive results and any harm done is of no interest to to me. If they can't do the time, then don't do the crime - I didn't ask them to hurt me.
Let's consider two of your uninformed judgements. You make reference to Courtneys achievements. There are many things that Courtney has acheived and amongst them is to become my friend. I do not make friends easily, but when I do they stay friends for a very long time. I go for quality, rather than quantity. She has earned my respect and my friendship, which is a damn sight more than you are ever likely to achieve.
Secondly, you responded to a post by Ruffiane regarding a response of mine to Rufus. You donned your amazing black and white dream coat to impart wisdom to all - again without knowing the facts. I do appreciate that talking about things you have no knowledge or understanding of, greatly increases your choice of subject matter, but there are a few things you didn't know.
Ruffiane and I have a history. Some time ago it made an unfounded allegation about my business. It is too stupid to check the facts, and assumed that everyone is as stupid as it is.
I have been around too long not to realise that in business, every now and then someone will come along and try to discrdeit you. I take precautions and I was able to produce documented and archived evidence that what it refered to, was in fact completely wrong. In the same post, it also refered to someone very close to me.
Others may forgive and forget, I don't - I see no percentage in it.
Oh, and before you make another patronising post about how people spend hours anguishing over responses; maybe it takes *you* hours to write an intelligent response, that's certainly not the case with me.
Mike
Mike Hitchen Sept 10, 2001
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.spanking.reality/browse_thread/thread/52b97017aa8d3a8e/7dd0981809771c90?lnk=gst&q=%20rufus+guv%27nor#7dd0981809771c90
For heavens sake lighten up; you are becoming a crashing bore with your uninformed, judgmental brand of coffee bar socialism regarding. issues you know very little about.
If you just stop whining for a while and read on, then you may actually learn from someone who I can assure you, knows far more about these things than your incredible naivety shows you ever will.
I run two businesses in which emotional issues are very much part and parcel of the work. If those involved in small business or "start ups" are experiencing personal, financial, family problems etc, that will affect their business. A great part of my work involves listening and trying to help solve those problems.
I get at least one client a week telling me they are contemplating suicide, and as yet, no one ever has. It is not something you can detach yourself from easily, especially when you have the experience and judgement to gauge the potential of such an act, and care about the people concerned.
In the last few weeks I have had seven "clients" lose someone close to them. I use inverted commas, because these people are more than just clients, they have become people I care about. At the same time, several close friends have also been through a lot.
I too have major problems both with my own health and that of a very close family member.
The point of the above is that Rufus is not in the above category. He is a professional attention seeker and one of the tools he uses to draw attention to himself is to hurt people. He has hurt Courtney, Beth, Dawn and many others. He goes out of his way to do so without any provocation.
It's his choice. I am not about to concern myself with some insignificant little arsehole who goes out of his way to hurt people I care about
People think I am hard because I often refuse those who come up to me in the street and ask for money or cigarettes. Those who judge me are much like yourself, they think they know the facts, would like to believe they know the facts - but don't.
For a very long time I worked in a homeless men's centre, something which is well documented. I know the difference between those who are genuine and those who are professional beggars. Those whoare genuine get any assistance I am able to give. The others...well I will let you figure out what they get. It's the same with Rufus.
Most of the people he has hurt know Rufus and are also emotionally strong enough to put his hate in perspective. But one day he will attack someone who is not so strong. They may be going through a difficult time, or they may just be sensitive. An attack by Rufus may just be the final straw.
Have you considered that fact at all? or do the narrow parameters of your home-on-the-range social philosophy extend only to defending someone who may top himself because he has received a negative reaction to a course of action he chose to embark on?
I have very little sympathy for anyone who hurts myself, family, friends or business. I count Court, Beth and Dawn as good friends - very good in fact. I do not care one iota about the perpetrator of hurt, but I do care about those who are the victims. When that happens my motto is "whatever it takes".
People who have hurt or crossed me have suffered nervous breakdowns and a marriage breakup as a consequence of my actions. I view those as positive results and any harm done is of no interest to to me. If they can't do the time, then don't do the crime - I didn't ask them to hurt me.
Let's consider two of your uninformed judgements. You make reference to Courtneys achievements. There are many things that Courtney has acheived and amongst them is to become my friend. I do not make friends easily, but when I do they stay friends for a very long time. I go for quality, rather than quantity. She has earned my respect and my friendship, which is a damn sight more than you are ever likely to achieve.
Secondly, you responded to a post by Ruffiane regarding a response of mine to Rufus. You donned your amazing black and white dream coat to impart wisdom to all - again without knowing the facts. I do appreciate that talking about things you have no knowledge or understanding of, greatly increases your choice of subject matter, but there are a few things you didn't know.
Ruffiane and I have a history. Some time ago it made an unfounded allegation about my business. It is too stupid to check the facts, and assumed that everyone is as stupid as it is.
I have been around too long not to realise that in business, every now and then someone will come along and try to discrdeit you. I take precautions and I was able to produce documented and archived evidence that what it refered to, was in fact completely wrong. In the same post, it also refered to someone very close to me.
Others may forgive and forget, I don't - I see no percentage in it.
Oh, and before you make another patronising post about how people spend hours anguishing over responses; maybe it takes *you* hours to write an intelligent response, that's certainly not the case with me.
Mike
Mike Hitchen Sept 10, 2001
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.spanking.reality/browse_thread/thread/52b97017aa8d3a8e/7dd0981809771c90?lnk=gst&q=%20rufus+guv%27nor#7dd0981809771c90
Saturday, 19 April 2008
Mike Hitchen: "The prime suspects in the death of their daughter"
Aren't they actually arguido's in the disappearance of their daughter, Mike?
Typical that he then goes on to accuse a fellow poster of being a keyboard monkey for having a different opinion.
Heard it all before Mike.
Mike Hitchen ignores police request
"Google refuse to remove any content without a court order, and I have the same policy."
Mike Hitchen: 3 April, 2008.
Works both ways.
Mike Hitchen: duh
Mike's new avatar - victory in what? Your hate campaign?You can't exactly claim victory for anything else from your highly secret underground cave, can you?
Can Hobnob and Mandy get any more stupid bizarre?
Considering how Mandy and Hobnob are aware of Hitchen's Hate Campaign... how can they now say this? :
How ironic and hypocritical that Mandy and Hobnob (an online forum host) should be discussing chidrens' online security with the master of online stalking, harassment and disguises such as Ziggy, sydneysydney, The Likely Lad and The Guv'nor who writes about child abuse and incest with his brother - and Anthony who is stalking Jeremy on various sites and forums!What is going on with these people?
Answers on a postcard please.
Friday, 18 April 2008
Mike Hitchen brags about listing Jeremy Young on 'News Now' under child abuse for 1.7 million people to see
Thursday, 17 April 2008
Mike Hitchen: Quote of the Year: "You seem to have a thing about sex don't you Young?"
Mike Hitchen updates his Hate Campaign on his 'business' website
(ever thought about taking an effective marketing course Mike?)
"You seem to have a thing about sex don't you Young?"
"You may live in an environment where such comments are considered acceptable, I do not - and I am bloody glad I don't."
"You may live in an environment where such comments are considered acceptable, I do not - and I am bloody glad I don't."
"There are now at least four spoof blogs about me using my photograph, my name, and pornographic images."
(the fourth 'spoof blog' only went live today Mike - nice of you to visit us already)
Wednesday, 16 April 2008
You'd never catch me talking to coppers like that:)
No, we wouldn't - this is how you talk to coppers
Reason for Hate Campaign against JKH
From this.....
To this....
http://jillkhavern.blogspot.com/
Because of this....
and this...and this...
and this...
but, most importantly, this...
and, finally...
Another lie exposed and rubbished
The real story of how an email was 'accidentally' leaked to others.
You will see this article was archived with 49 messages that can still be read (which have been screenshotted and saved should Hitchen decide to delete them).
You will also notice that, while Hitchen is complaining about his email being posted in a forum, he is quite happy to post HenryDog's email on his blog.
The 49 comments can be read here
(unfortunately Mike Hitchen has now removed this link because he's obviously scared about it, but I have screenshotted it anyway)
Some good advice from Hitchen
Thanks for this, Mike. It'll come in useful. Looks like you know all about online harassment eh?
Master of it, in fact.
As for your checklist:
1. Yes, we did ask you to stop
2. We are logging all the evidence right here on this blog
3. We have contacted your isp
4. We have kept all your chatroom transcripts etc and contacted the police
5. Don't worry, we won't forget. Cheers, Mike, you're a pal.
How Mike Hitchen's Hate Campaign began - The McCann's: Why?
click on image to enlargeThis is the post that kicked off all the hatred from Mike because someone had the audacity to query his plea for more information when he'd been telling his readers that he had inside information that would nail the McCann's and now we were starting to realise it had all been a bluff.
There were hundreds of replies to this, all of which he's deleted as he's now tidying up his affairs to protect himself.
"The Madeleine McCann threads on this blog aim to right those wrongs, to provide a voice for the betrayed, the angry and the frustrated. If anyone reading this can help make our voices be heard even louder, you can email me at newperspectives@iprimus.com.au.
Those who have helped before, will tell you I protect those who have come to our aid. Despite what some may think, I am quite approachable and always answer emails!
There is a lot in my past I regret and that I am ashamed of. This campaign is not one of them."
Oh yes, Mike, we've found quite a lot of the stuff that you should be ashamed of. Maybe your 'Madeleine McCann' campaign is not something you are ashamed of, but you should be very ashamed of your 'Child at Risk' campaign - and so should your supporters such as Mariana Faithful, Pamalam, and Primavera (the ones who also have websites about children).
Monday, 14 April 2008
No mates fans Hitchen
http://www.technorati.com/blogs/tag/child+pornography20 Blogs about child pornography - Hitchen lists his 'child at risk' blog
Mike Hitchen twists the truth to the police
Actually, Mike, you took your hate campaign to Bradford Community Radio Station on 11th March and there were 5 posts in reply to you asking for information about Jeremy, starting on 23 March - hardly a flood was it?
http://bcb.myfastforum.org/viewcardtopic.php?t=6
Did you remember to tell West Yorks Police that it was actually you who was posing as Anthony in order to find out information about Jeremy Young?
Don't suppose you did, but we've got it all recorded just in case they need it :)
Don't suppose you did, but we've got it all recorded just in case they need it :)
Sunday, 13 April 2008
Mike Hitchen engaged to a US Republican
"Bushites use children to spread propaganda"
(which, of course, you would never think of doing yourself, right maggot?)
Mike Hitchen's new alias
Mike Hitchen, attracted to another 'Maddy' finds a new alias to add to 'The Guv'nor', 'Ziggy', 'Likely Lad' and 'Anthony' - now we have 'Mkike H'.
Mike Hitchen's smokescreen
Mike Hitchen, the sexual predator who wrote about tying a child to a ladder before exploring her 'Garden of Eden', keeps up his smokescreen of pretending to care about another child, Madeleine McCann.
Saturday, 12 April 2008
Give him enough rope....
How nice to see Mike Hitchen's own 'Child at Risk' blog is listing him as a moderator of spanking and a sick nutter! Justice indeed by thy own fair hand.
Friday, 11 April 2008
Pots and Kettles
Despite being warned by police to stop his hate campaign Mike Hitchen, Lane Cove's sexual predator, updates his profile to refer to Jeremy as a child pervert - despite evidence posted on this blog that is written by Mike Hitchen himself, that proves he's actually a pervert himself who fantasises and lusts after children.
Mike Hitchen: Getting in another cheap shot regarding Jeremy and Melted Barbie in response to question about the McCann's
Thursday, 10 April 2008
Wednesday, 9 April 2008
Tuesday, 8 April 2008
New Evidence Blog
Due to the large amount of material/screenshots now being contributed by many people to the Evidence Reference Library, a separate blog has been created to store any new evidence.Following requests from some of those submitting evidence who are still members of Mike Hitchen's secret 'Dream Team' forum, who wish to protect their identities, a decision has been taken to make the new blog open to members only.
These people have witnessed first hand how Mike Hitchen deliberately sets about to destroy peoples' lives with his hate campaign - first with Jeremy Young, then Jill Havern, and now Jane Freer becoming his latest victim and are justifiably anxious for their own safety.
This blog will still be used to keep everyone up to date with proceedings.
Mike Hitchen tells Police how to do their job with non negotiable options and threats
Click link for full story as it's too big to post here
Know thy enemy and know thy self
Sun Tzu Wu said, "Know thy enemy and know thy self and you will win a hundred battles" It's a policy I have adopted for a long time and has stood me in good stead.
Information gives me the means to formulate effective strategies to address foreseeable actions that have the potential to impact negatively on myself, family or friends.
On my business website, I advertise "Research" and "Investigation" Have done so for a long time. Information gives you the edge. It is the roller that changes the level playing field to ones advantage. Do you think I would advertise such services if I was not fully capable or had systems in place to be able to do so?
Know thy enemy.
Mike
Mike Hitchen 6 November, 2001
Mike Hitchen running scared
32,000 files deleted from his computer over the weekend, Hitchen's photo removed from his blog and replaced with 'Willing to march into Hell' avatar, secretive new 'members only' blogs including one for Jane Freer, the lady he drove to attempt suicide...
Seems he can dish out the dirt but he can't take having the truth revealed. Coward.
Monday, 7 April 2008
Tinman: Here's your own creche space
Tinman, please use this comments box for your personal use and leave ours alone.
That way you can yadda, yadda, yadda all you like and not bother us. Thoughtful, huh?
Sunday, 6 April 2008
Saturday, 5 April 2008
Friday, 4 April 2008
Is this our troll? Jack H from Solihull?
Thursday, 3 April 2008
Let's not forget what Mike Hitchen wrote about Jack
"I was thinking of a cute, naive boy who I had taken advantage of. I was not proud of what happened with Jack. This time he was not a conquest. "I realized that now as I recalled Jack yelling as he was caned. Father Brian was singing My Way, and my body was singing a Bohemian Rhapsody. I turned on my stomach, rubbing myself against the coarse bedspread. My bottom arched in the air, offering myself to some unknown person. Was it Father Brian or Mother Superior?" Mike Hitchen 16 September, 2003
Wednesday, 2 April 2008
Mike Hitchen uses 'Company' Blog for Press Releases of his Hate Campaign
Mike Hitchen complains about an online hate campaign against him, although provides no evidence in support, then lists his own online hate campaign on his business blog as Press Releases.
Tuesday, 1 April 2008
Mike Hitchen takes credit for April Fool's joke of shutting down blog
Dispute this, 'Tinman' (who mysteriously goes to bed at the same time as Hitchen)
Mike Hitchen links to Myra Hindley child killer
The 'image' of Myra Hindley is actually an image of Mike Hitchen!
Monday, 31 March 2008
Mike Hitchen's ongoing Hate Campaign
Presumably it was Mike Hitchen who "discredited" Jill Havern's book and now
questions her "fitness" to be a driving instructor.
questions her "fitness" to be a driving instructor.
Sunday, 30 March 2008
Open letter to Mike Hitchen
Dear Mike Hitchen
Following your recent post on your ionglobaltrends blog please answer the following questions:
1. Please provide evidence of the "widespread concern" which relates to the alleged sexual remarks by Jeremy Young.
2. Please provide evidence of the confirmation of the investigation by Child and Public Protection Unit, Bradford, to which you refer.
3. You say a number of references were made regarding the alleged sex acts with Jeremy's stillborn baby. Please provide evidence of the number of references and their content.
4. Please provide evidence of "other references between child and parent" that you allege took place.
5. Please clarify who is the "widely respected Australian blogger" to whom you refer.
6. Please provide evidence of the alleged "attacks" on blogs of anyone connected to you.
7. Please confirm who it is who has discredited author Jill Havern.
8. Please provide evidence of the "hoax call" made to NSW police.
9. Please provide evidence of the forums that you claim Jill Havern has been banned from.
You will note that this blog has been laden with evidence on our part, so it is only fair to invite you to do the same. You are respectfully invited to use the comments box provided or you can send your evidence by email and it will be published on this blog.
Clearly you have such evidence or you would not risk publishing such accusations. You will note that this is an open and public blog and people will be able to make their own minds up following the submission of your evidence. If you do not trust your evidence to be posted on this blog, then please post it on your own blog for the world to see.
We await your response.
Thank you.
Following your recent post on your ionglobaltrends blog please answer the following questions:
1. Please provide evidence of the "widespread concern" which relates to the alleged sexual remarks by Jeremy Young.
2. Please provide evidence of the confirmation of the investigation by Child and Public Protection Unit, Bradford, to which you refer.
3. You say a number of references were made regarding the alleged sex acts with Jeremy's stillborn baby. Please provide evidence of the number of references and their content.
4. Please provide evidence of "other references between child and parent" that you allege took place.
5. Please clarify who is the "widely respected Australian blogger" to whom you refer.
6. Please provide evidence of the alleged "attacks" on blogs of anyone connected to you.
7. Please confirm who it is who has discredited author Jill Havern.
8. Please provide evidence of the "hoax call" made to NSW police.
9. Please provide evidence of the forums that you claim Jill Havern has been banned from.
You will note that this blog has been laden with evidence on our part, so it is only fair to invite you to do the same. You are respectfully invited to use the comments box provided or you can send your evidence by email and it will be published on this blog.
Clearly you have such evidence or you would not risk publishing such accusations. You will note that this is an open and public blog and people will be able to make their own minds up following the submission of your evidence. If you do not trust your evidence to be posted on this blog, then please post it on your own blog for the world to see.
We await your response.
Thank you.
Saturday, 29 March 2008
Conundrum
Any clues why Mike Hitchen's Hate/Child at Risk campaign should be labelled under Madeleine McCann and New Zealand Publishing? Answers on a postcard - or in the comments box please.Tuesday, 25 March 2008
News at Ten: Mike Hitchen has a one hour meeting with NSW Police
BREAKING NEWS!Press Release:
"UPDATE: The NSPCC has advised that they have contacted the Child Protection Police in Bradford who assured them that they have undertaken an investigation which includes working alongside other agencies.
Jill Havern is also the centre of a complaint with West Midlands Police and following a one hour meeting with New South Wales Police, they too are aware of what has been happening. Police in at least two other countries have also been contacted by other victims of their campaign."
The following is a transcript from the 1 hour meeting:
Maggot: Hello Mr Policeman, I'd like to make a complaint please.
NSW policeman: Hello again Mr Maggot, what complaint have you got today?
Maggot: Well, there's a woman in the UK who's stalking me.
NSW policeman: Really? Do you have any proof?
Maggot: No. But that's not all. She wrote a book about the NHS and made outrageous claims!
NSW policeman: Really? What claims were they?
Maggot: Well, I don't know, I didn't read the crap book.
NSW policeman: I see. Is there anything else I can help you with, Mr Maggot?
Maggot: Yes, there is. She and a big pink cat from Ealing have created a blog about me that contains pornographic material!
NSW policeman: Really... do you have any spoof... er, sorry, proof?
Maggot: Well, no.
NSW policeman: Mr Maggot, before we can take any action we need to see hard evidence.
Maggot: OK, how about this then... she wouldn't talk dirty to me and she queried one of my articles on my award winning blog and then she had the audacity to leave my award winning blog when I attacked another blogger about his baby!
NSW policeman: Go on, Mr Maggot, tell me more.
Maggot: Well, there isn't any more. BUT, hang on a minute! She's now forced me to create a libellous blog about her and the other blogger! And she's also forced me to register with tons of forums so that I can post vile things about them both! She's even forced me to start a 'child at risk' campaign! Can you imagine how much of my time that takes up when I could be walking through the boys' school with my camera or writing pervy stories about spanking children? Indeed, only last night I was on their blog for more than 5 hours posting pornographic comments in an attempt to get their spoof blog shut down. What are you going to do about it Mr Policeman?
NSW policeman: Mr Maggot, can I please ask you to put this jacket on? I realise the arms are very long and that they tie up at the back but...
Maggot: Oh, very nice, but do you have it in any other colour? And why are you putting me in this room with no windows? Hello???
1 hour meeting consisting of:
3 minutes to report complaint
57 minutes to secure jacket
"UPDATE: The NSPCC has advised that they have contacted the Child Protection Police in Bradford who assured them that they have undertaken an investigation which includes working alongside other agencies.
Jill Havern is also the centre of a complaint with West Midlands Police and following a one hour meeting with New South Wales Police, they too are aware of what has been happening. Police in at least two other countries have also been contacted by other victims of their campaign."
The following is a transcript from the 1 hour meeting:
Maggot: Hello Mr Policeman, I'd like to make a complaint please.
NSW policeman: Hello again Mr Maggot, what complaint have you got today?
Maggot: Well, there's a woman in the UK who's stalking me.
NSW policeman: Really? Do you have any proof?
Maggot: No. But that's not all. She wrote a book about the NHS and made outrageous claims!
NSW policeman: Really? What claims were they?
Maggot: Well, I don't know, I didn't read the crap book.
NSW policeman: I see. Is there anything else I can help you with, Mr Maggot?
Maggot: Yes, there is. She and a big pink cat from Ealing have created a blog about me that contains pornographic material!
NSW policeman: Really... do you have any spoof... er, sorry, proof?
Maggot: Well, no.
NSW policeman: Mr Maggot, before we can take any action we need to see hard evidence.
Maggot: OK, how about this then... she wouldn't talk dirty to me and she queried one of my articles on my award winning blog and then she had the audacity to leave my award winning blog when I attacked another blogger about his baby!
NSW policeman: Go on, Mr Maggot, tell me more.
Maggot: Well, there isn't any more. BUT, hang on a minute! She's now forced me to create a libellous blog about her and the other blogger! And she's also forced me to register with tons of forums so that I can post vile things about them both! She's even forced me to start a 'child at risk' campaign! Can you imagine how much of my time that takes up when I could be walking through the boys' school with my camera or writing pervy stories about spanking children? Indeed, only last night I was on their blog for more than 5 hours posting pornographic comments in an attempt to get their spoof blog shut down. What are you going to do about it Mr Policeman?
NSW policeman: Mr Maggot, can I please ask you to put this jacket on? I realise the arms are very long and that they tie up at the back but...
Maggot: Oh, very nice, but do you have it in any other colour? And why are you putting me in this room with no windows? Hello???
1 hour meeting consisting of:
3 minutes to report complaint
57 minutes to secure jacket
Mike Hitchen and Primavera's plan didn't quite pay off
http://network-tools.com/default.asp?prog=network&host=222.127.228.6
Someone had fun last night posting multiple, and various, pornographic comments (pic 2) to this blog, which were deleted as fast as they were being posted, and the comments facility was closed overnight to prevent further spamming. The ip was traced to Australia, despite the proxy showing the Philippines. This same someone was reading the goings-on over at the 3Arguido's because his entry link on the statcounter (pic 1) showed that was where he was coming from to get onto this blog. He stayed on this blog for over 5 hours! It begs the question why anyone from Australia would need to use a proxy to disguise his presence on this blog in order to post pornographic comments anonymously on a site that is trying to stop a 'child at risk' campaign created by Mike Hitchen in Australia - who posts pornographic content using the 'anonymous' name 'Anthony'.Despite Primavera complaining about the 'same' Philippino spamming her blog, you can see from the bottom pic that, once they were back in Mike's secret 'Dream Team' forum, she told Mike he was very clever (pic 3).
These two people, amongst others on Mike's forum (Mariana Faithful, Pamalam etc), have created websites to allegedly seek justice for Madeleine McCann whilst plotting to have an innocent newborn baby taken from his parents, and to intentionally disrupt any efforts to stop their campaign.
Make of it what you will, but this campaign will continue until Baby Young is no longer under any kind of threat from Hitchen and his accomplices because that is what real justice for ALL children means.
Hitchen has now updated his 'press release' on his business blog.
(are the press really taking notice of him?)
Monday, 24 March 2008
Mike Hitchen poses as 'Anthony' to take his hate campaign to Bradford Poetry Society
click on pic to enlargeSunday, 23 March 2008
Saturday, 22 March 2008
Thursday, 20 March 2008
Mike Hitchen: This is what real men do for children
Mike, take a real close look at this photo. It's a real man fighting a real war with an innocent child caught in the crossfire. The only war you are capable of fighting is a 'blog war' from the safety of your bedroom - but with an innocent child caught in your line of fire. Grow up, and let Freddie do the same.
Monday, 17 March 2008
Risk Assessment
"How a maggot develops"
I see you have also made another post about Jeremy Young titled Risk Assessment.
In that article you ask many questions about Jeremy's suitability to adopt a child.
Has it slipped your attention that he and his wife do not need to adopt? His wife is having a baby. You will be aware of that because you have created a 'child at risk' campaign, supported by the likes of Mariana Faithful, to have this baby removed from his parents.
You even advertise your campaign on your so-called 'business blog' which you state is accessed by schoolchildren.
So where does your latest article come into the great scheme of things? Is this just another attempt at vindictive malice? Are you really so bored and lonely that you cannot think of more constructive things to do with your day? Is it half term over there and the schools are closed and you have no children to watch?
On the other hand, maggot, I wonder what your own suitability would be for adopting a child when you have written many perverted stories about taking advantage of young children and have publicly published these stories on the internet? Anyone wishing to find these stories only have to look at the links published on the right hand side of this blog titled "Mike Hitchen's Pervy Links". There are many more of these stories to be found, but reading those will give anyone an insight into your warped and dangerous mind.
Of course, you have also publicly published, on the internet, your hatred and revenge for your mother.
Bates Motel is hardly a proper environment for any child.
Hacking with hobnob
So, Mike Hitchen has made another posting on his 'Child at Risk' blog:
"Friday, March 14, 2008
Hacking
This is how Young and his supporters try to attack a private forum. They use Reflected Networks. Wikipedia has this to say about the IP Address they use: This IP address has been blocked because it is believed to be an open proxy or zombie computer.
I have deleted the passowrd/member name they tried to use and replaced it with **** "
Maggot, this is old news and has already been addressed, proven and rubbished that your 'alleged' hackers did not come from this site. You can see the results here, here, and here.
You will see from this post, that was copied directly from Maggot's forum on 15th March, that the alleged 'hacker' used hobnobs details. Oops, sorry Mike, you wanted that deleted didn't you? Oh well, never mind, what's a few public details between
Mike, you need to come up with concrete facts about your accusations because all you're doing is being a total knob-head and toilet queen and no one takes you seriously anymore. You also need to accept that no one needs to hack your 'private' forum because many of us are already in it at your own invitation!
It is obvious that you pretended to hack hobnobs account just so that you could print more libellous material on your libellous blog.
This blog is factual. Yours is not.
Maggot's new blog award
Congratulations on your new blog award, Mike! We all know how much they mean to you :)
Mariana Faithful supports Mike Hitchen's 'Child at Risk' campaign
Mariana Faithful supports 'Child at Risk' campaign in her comment box - then closes her comment box. Too late, Mariana, we've got it!
Sunday, 16 March 2008
Saturday, 15 March 2008
Is there anything else we can help you with Mr Hitchen?
Mr Hitchen please feel free to use this space to tell us what more of your accusations we can rubbish. Because everything you've said so far has got evidence to disprove it. The only things we can't prove so far are the accusations where YOU have not provided evidence to back-up your claims.
Strange that.
Strange that.
It's not us
Your 'hackers' don't seem to have come from this site, Mike. Maybe you have more 'enemies' than you think? In fact, Mike, could it not be that you are using that IP address yourself to create suspicion, and garner sympathy from your staunch 'child at risk' campaigners, because your IP address that is logged on here is 210.50.16.8 and it says you've only visited here once, which was 12th March at 14.40pm. Yet, strangely, you have left comments on this blog on various dates, so which IP were you using then, I wonder, hmmmm?
Master of disguises aren't you?
Mike Hitchen catches 'em red-handed
So, if the organisation 'hacking' Mike is called Reflected Networks why is he targetting TFA and Jill? Something to do, I suppose.
Mike Hitchen tracking his 'hackers'
As Hitchen knows all our IP addresses why does he keep calling us 'hackers' when our IP addresses don't match?
Oh the little cowards are trying to hack in again:)
Actually, most of your 'hackers' are actually people who log in at your invitation Mike - they're just not on your side as you think they are that's all. :)
Friday, 14 March 2008
Mike Hitchen's new blog
Thursday, 13 March 2008
Oldcrone from the 3 Arguido's - the site set up for Justice for Madeleine McCann
Oldcrone, weren't you the one who got into TFA's forum under false pretences then went whining back to Hitchen so he could get it closed down? Why are you on a blog that seeks justice for Madeleine McCann when you turn your back on justice for an unborn baby and, indeed, quite clearly support a deranged pervert who has instigated a 'child at risk' campaign based on a poem written by a grieving father?
Wednesday, 12 March 2008
Pamalam glad to be back with Mike Hitchen
Pamalam is a woman who is collecting evidence about Madeleine McCann on her blog: Gerry McCann's Blogs. *By Pamalam - whilst, at the same time, supporting Mike Hitchen's 'Child at Risk' campaign to have Freddie removed from Jeremy Young and his wife. Freddie is not born yet, and Mike has reported Jeremy to Social Services because he wrote a poem about his stillborn daughter. So desperate was Pamalam to rejoin his forum that she has now signed up with a new name.
Chemist
Mike Hitchen invites the "Dead Ethels" to pop to the chemist for a permanent solution to all their problems.
Mike Hitchen comments from main blog
Mike Hitchen comments saved from main blog (post title "Click pics to enlarge for bestest clarity") for those of you who may have missed them.
