I see you have also made another post about Jeremy Young titled Risk Assessment.
In that article you ask many questions about Jeremy's suitability to adopt a child.
Has it slipped your attention that he and his wife do not need to adopt? His wife is having a baby. You will be aware of that because you have created a 'child at risk' campaign, supported by the likes of Mariana Faithful, to have this baby removed from his parents.
You even advertise your campaign on your so-called 'business blog' which you state is accessed by schoolchildren.
So where does your latest article come into the great scheme of things? Is this just another attempt at vindictive malice? Are you really so bored and lonely that you cannot think of more constructive things to do with your day? Is it half term over there and the schools are closed and you have no children to watch?
On the other hand, maggot, I wonder what your own suitability would be for adopting a child when you have written many perverted stories about taking advantage of young children and have publicly published these stories on the internet? Anyone wishing to find these stories only have to look at the links published on the right hand side of this blog titled "Mike Hitchen's Pervy Links". There are many more of these stories to be found, but reading those will give anyone an insight into your warped and dangerous mind.
Of course, you have also publicly published, on the internet, your hatred and revenge for your mother.
Bates Motel is hardly a proper environment for any child.